OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: TD42 vs RD28 fuel consumption

  1. #1
    Beginner
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEQ
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question TD42 vs RD28 fuel consumption

    Looking to buy a GQ (maybe a GU but I like GQs more) patrol for my first car. Already test drove a few 4.2s and 2.8s in my area. I can tell the RD28T is gutless compared to the TD42. I only work at Maccas and im scared im going to have trouble affording fuel for a TD42. How much better is the RD28T on fuel consumption? I live in sunshine coast so its mainly town driving to school and work and do it a bit of 4 wheeling in the local forestery. I want to stay away from 3 litres as many mechanics told me they have issues. Any help or tips would be great.

    Cheers, Oscar.

  2. #2
    ......... MB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Yarra Valley
    Posts
    8,876
    Thanks
    23,535
    Thanked 11,762 Times in 5,110 Posts
    Mentioned
    481 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Welcome aboard Oscar!
    Go the GQ 4.2 mate one of the best 4x4s ever made. We've got a GU4.2 being a little bigger for our family of 4 and get around 600kms per 80L tank on the flat ground. GQ's being lighter will go even better on fuel. Once you've got some extra money down the track you can do some amazing power ups on the 4.2s.
    Cheers!

  3. #3
    The 747 Winnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gippsland, VIC
    Posts
    15,848
    Thanks
    7,305
    Thanked 12,549 Times in 6,287 Posts
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cr80442 View Post
    Looking to buy a GQ (maybe a GU but I like GQs more) patrol for my first car. Already test drove a few 4.2s and 2.8s in my area. I can tell the RD28T is gutless compared to the TD42. I only work at Maccas and im scared im going to have trouble affording fuel for a TD42. How much better is the RD28T on fuel consumption? I live in sunshine coast so its mainly town driving to school and work and do it a bit of 4 wheeling in the local forestery. I want to stay away from 3 litres as many mechanics told me they have issues. Any help or tips would be great.

    Cheers, Oscar.
    The RD28 is not really any more fuel efficient than the TD42.
    I get around 15L/100km and since some work I've done recently I expect that has come down a bit but I haven't had a chance to measure it.
    I would expect the 2.8 to cost a bit more in maintenance too.

  4. #4
    Legendary happygu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,019
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 1,037 Times in 846 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 2.8 might be about 1 dollar cheaper to run every hundred kilometres.

    Hardly any real difference.

    if it is the 3 litre Petrol in the GQ that you may be looking at, these are not the troublesome engines ..... it is the early 3 litre Di's in the GU.
    GU PATROL 2011 Ti, with goodies...

  5. #5
    Patrol God mudnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    SW Vic.
    Posts
    8,084
    Thanks
    10,991
    Thanked 5,619 Times in 3,291 Posts
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Being a small diesel, the 2.8 struggles to haul the vehicle around for everyday running. As Winnie posted, you have to factor in the a timing belt replacement in the servicing cost. I'm not sure how many kilometres or years that the belt has to be changed at though. There has been a few cases of the key stripping out of the harmonic balancer, the cam gear cracking off and head problems in the RD28. Apart from that they seem to be a slow but reliable engine. They also use a lighter gearbox than the TD42.
    Last edited by mudnut; 20th November 2016 at 11:00 PM.
    My advice is: not to follow my advice.

  6. #6
    Travelling Podologist Cuppa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Ballarat, Vic
    Posts
    6,795
    Thanks
    2,170
    Thanked 7,553 Times in 3,041 Posts
    Mentioned
    176 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a different viewpoint. If you are going to be in a position where it is difficult to afford the fuel bill ............ get a smaller car. Not much point having a large 4wd which sits unused much of the time because you cant afford to run it. It wont just be fuel bills which cost either.

    2006 4.2TDi ex-Telstra Remote area Camper.
    Patrol Sold after 11 years of ownership Replaced with 2006 OKA NT Expedition Truck. Cummins, Allison & lots of goodies
    A Nomadic Life (Blog)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •