Reversing camera

[kevin07]

im about to order a kokoda battalion caravan and I want to fit a reverse camera to it, whilst its getting built I will be supplying it. so my question is what is a good camera as I have no clue. thanks kev

[mudski]

Kevin I can only talk about what l have so take it with a grain of salt. Mine is a simple Ebay job. Cost around 20 bux. it works well. Clear vision but has no night vision. But I have a bright reverse light so it doesn't matter.
Look for something with a wide view and night vision and you'll be set.
Do you need a screen too or just the camera?

[BillsGU]

The one on my caravan is a rear view camera rather than a reversing camera - it is on all the time. This works really well and I get the feeling sometimes that the van is not even there because as I look up at my mirror (which is also my monitor) I see the same view with or without the caravan attached. I have played around with different cameras over the last couple of years and I found the cheapies have two main faults. Firstly they eventually let in moisture and secondly their angle of view is too wide for a rear view camera. The traffic behind you looks to be too far away.

The camera I have now has a 30 degree viewing angle - which is close to what you see in a rear view mirror, and it is rated to IP 68 - which means it will work under water. So far it works really well.

If I had to do it all again I would install two cameras, a wide view for reversing and hooking up and a narrow view for rear vision. Most monitors have more that one switchable input so you can switch between the two. You can buy them mounted in one housing. They are not cheap - but they are worth the money.

Also, make sure you buy good quality cabling that goes from your dash, to the rear of the car, then with connectors to the caravan and then to the camera. Cheap cable and connectors will let in dust and water and give you no end of problems.

[Cuppa]

Having now had several reversing/rear vision cameras I very much agree with what BillsGU has told you. The narrow angle with give you much better depth of field, allowing you to see vehicles coming from much further away. If you were to use a wide angle camera for driving you could be in for some unpleasnt surprises when vehicles approaching from behind suddenly appear ‘out of nowhere’ right up your klacker. I would have loved to have got a narrower angle than my 60 degree one, but it was the narrowest I could find at the time.

BillsGU I would be interested where you managed to get a 30 degree one & at what cost? Would be good to know in case I need to replace mine at some stage.

I have dual wide & narrow(ish) angle cameras, but find I never use the wide angle one.

I should add that whilst I would not want to be without my camera for driving, I do drive primarily on the side mirrors. When out of town I most often locate vehicles approaching from behind in the mirrors first & then monitor them via the camera. In town with closer traffic the camera is invaluable. The 60 degree angle camera is also good for reversing.

My dual camera’s were around $100, but the seller no longer has them.
The monitor is an ebay one which fits over the original rear vision mirror. I find this most suitable.

Two different types of cameras. CMOS & CCD. This relates to the type of sensor they have. Go for CCD, I’ve had both & the quality difference of the images is chalk & cheese. CCD costs more but is definitely worth it. Also bigger sensors are better than smaller sensors.

[the evil twin]

What Cuppa and Bill said x 2

You kinda need to decide if you want rear view or reversing as the field of view is markedly different.

IMHO anything wider than 60 degree on the back of a van is a PIA.
Over 60 up to 120 degrees works OK on a vehicle but it is a different perspective (excuse the pun).

On a Van you are trying to actually see what is back there in a more normal sense and from higher up/further away and the fish eye effect is crap.

On a Car you are trying to fill in the close up dead spots usually from a very low angle and the fish eye distortion isn't a big issue

[BillsGU]

This is where I bought my camera Cuppa. They sell top of the line security equipment.

http://www.nassecurity.com.au/

[Cuppa]

This is where I bought my camera Cuppa. They sell top of the line security equipment.

http://www.nassecurity.com.au/

Thanks BillsGU, that’s a good find. & not a bad price either.
http://www.nassecurity.com.au/30-degree.html

[kevin07]

ok thanks guys could you throw a few brand names up please, I just need a reversing camera im good with the mirrors as ive been driving trucks and buses all my life. I have so far a factory reverse camera on the troll. thanks kev

[Cuppa]

I think this is one area where paying more for brand name appliances isn’t likely to get you extra value. So much so that I don’t know of any Brand names for cameras or monitors. However Sony & Sharp sensors are good. If not keen on ebay which I would consider the best bet particularly for a reversing only camera the link that BillsGU came with his recommendation & looks worthwhile. If you go CCD with a ⅓” sensor you should be good. A touch screen will likely be less prone to vibration damage over time.

Buying a complete set up (Camera/cable/monitor) may save any hassle with ensuring you have compatible connectors but most sellers will have the right cables if you buy components separately. More often the extra cost for a complete set up over buying separates is just for the convenience factor.

Oh yes, I don’t think this has been mentioned yet ....... everyone I know who has bought wireless camera set ups have been disappointed with them. Wired, although taking a bit more installation effort are more reliable.

[Evo]

I bought my camera and screen from Repco, $79 on sale.
All plug and play, also has second input in screen for second camera.
Mine is primarily for reversing, but for the price is pretty good.
Has night vision also.

Evo