OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: What do you think about Low Range Reduction Gears

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Enjoying the trips macca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Old Bar, NSW
    Posts
    3,051
    Thanks
    1,640
    Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,080 Posts
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What do you think about Low Range Reduction Gears

    I have a bit of a dilema, our patrols a fairly high geared and with mine do most difficult parts of tracks in low low.
    Other brands do the same in low 2nd, leaving them a crawler gear for the harder stuff and good engine braking down hill.
    I have been in situations where slipping the clutch and holding the revs at 2000 - 2500 is the only way to proceed.
    This has not happened often but abusing the clutch like that is not a good thing.
    So looking at reduction gears for the low box is raising more questions than answers, if you have a look at the spreadsheet attached it explains the possible benifits.
    If you have reduction gears can you post your opinions especially the effect on different terrains.
    The 65:1 would be awsome on the rocky climbs but what about the Canning Stock Route? It has 2nd gear matching the 1st in a stock set up.
    Appreciate your thoughts whether you have them or not.
    Cheers Macca
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by macca; 11th May 2012 at 08:09 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •