OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Adjusting Brake sensing proportioning valve (BSPV)

  1. #1
    Expert
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Pottsville
    Posts
    185
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Adjusting Brake sensing proportioning valve (BSPV)

    Just reading through the Nissan Patrol Manuals and thought this might benefit others, the following document- Nissan Patrol Reference Document discusses a bit of everything, but, the bit I found useful and which I have just performed is to do with the BSPV.
    It states, if you have a lift on your vehicle (whatever the lift) the BSPV needs to be raised to meet that lift. If this is not done, you won't have any assistance from the back brakes when pulling up, especially if vehicle is heavily loaded. It gives you spring measurement, angles(showing relation of spring to arm) and pictures, eg, I have a 2" lift, so raised the arm 2". Just took it for a brake test run and could not believe the difference it made, I don't think my rear brakes have been working properly since the lift went in about 8 years ago.
    It was simply a matter of undoing the arm and putting a bit of flat metal in and therefore raising the arm up, assuring the spring measurement and angle were correct.
    I hope this helps others
    Last edited by june; 28th May 2013 at 03:13 PM.
    3lt GU 111 Wagon 2 inch lift,3in Taipan exhaust, cross country intercooler,catch can,EGR blocked, dawes and needle valve,Pyro/boost gauge ARB lockers,steinbaurer chip, long range tank, s/s water tank, draws, warn winch, and other stuff.

  2. #2
    Travelling Podologist Cuppa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Ballarat, Vic
    Posts
    6,795
    Thanks
    2,170
    Thanked 7,554 Times in 3,041 Posts
    Mentioned
    176 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I got my GVM upgrade done (which included a 2" lift), one of the things done as part of the setup was adjusting the brake proportioning to give a bit more of the braking to the rear wheels. At first the idea of increasing the proportion of the braking to the rear (& corresponding reduction to the front) just didn't seem logical to me, given the increased carrying capacity. ....... But it seems to work ok. It had to as it had to pass a series of braking tests, both stationary & dynamic, before the upgrade could be passed. I can't say that it improved the braking, but with the extra weight on board it seems much the same. Apparently one of the things that had to be avoided was too much 'nose dive' under heavy braking, together with a 'return to level position' without bucking & carrying on. This was achieved by using longer than normal front coil springs together with the brake portioning adjustment, with the view that with extra weight over the rear axle that this too helps to ensure better grip under heavy braking conditions.
    I can't recall what the standard pro portioning ratio is between front & back, but would gues it would be something like 60/40.
    I think it is now closer to 50/50.
    Not something to muck around with unless you have a good idea of what you are doing though.

    Cuppa

    2006 4.2TDi ex-Telstra Remote area Camper.
    Patrol Sold after 11 years of ownership Replaced with 2006 OKA NT Expedition Truck. Cummins, Allison & lots of goodies
    A Nomadic Life (Blog)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Cuppa For This Useful Post:

    BigRAWesty (28th May 2013)

  4. #3
    Patrol God nissannewby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    North brissy
    Posts
    8,198
    Thanks
    1,513
    Thanked 5,665 Times in 3,158 Posts
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    It doesn't reduce the force applied to the front. It only changes what is applied to the back. Hence why it will allow greater braking when a load is on the back and as you said you have more weight on the back now so a little extra traction, so more breaking force can be applied and also as you said it then keeps the car more stable under heavy braking in most conditions

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nissannewby For This Useful Post:

    BigRAWesty (28th May 2013), MudRunnerTD (29th May 2013)

  6. #4
    Patrol God BigRAWesty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Mount Gambier, SA
    Posts
    13,567
    Thanks
    16,026
    Thanked 4,794 Times in 3,173 Posts
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thus why you should install a bracket to lower the valve back to standard hight, or you will have less rear brake threw the load range compared to stock setup..

    Kallen Westbrook
    Owner of
    Westy's Accessories
    Cheers
    Kallen Westbrook

  7. #5
    Expert
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Pottsville
    Posts
    185
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    until i did this mod vehicle would nose dive big time and under heavy braking would take a lot of road to pull up. since fitting bracket vehicle stops in a shorter distance with minimal nose dive.
    3lt GU 111 Wagon 2 inch lift,3in Taipan exhaust, cross country intercooler,catch can,EGR blocked, dawes and needle valve,Pyro/boost gauge ARB lockers,steinbaurer chip, long range tank, s/s water tank, draws, warn winch, and other stuff.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to june For This Useful Post:

    MudRunnerTD (29th May 2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •