I find it curious that the first 6 or so pages of posts almost everyone acknowledged it was "a typo or error" and if indeed it was all they would be after as "compensation" would be money back.
The seller, who could have handled it many different ways depending on point of view offered money back and even a small gratuity or discounts on other products.
That seemed pretty fair to me and is in line with arbitration and Common Law where everyone should be "made whole", no more, no less.
Now it seems that people are determined to rip him for, what, say $100 assuming 100% markup but even if he is out $50 it isn't right in my humble opinion.
If I was the vendor i would have simple reversed the payments and left it at that then there is no dispute at all.
Finally, another thread has degenerated into some fairly off comments.
IMHO this whole issue is between the buyers and the vendor with Ebay and/or Paypal as the umpires.
Also given the events of a coupel of weeks ago, I for one would suggest it is time to get over it and for AB or Mods to lock the thread
Reply With Quote