It is a tough ask I believe, 'cos we're not ready to give up the "comforts" of modern life.Quote:
Originally Posted by nissannewby
Printable View
It is a tough ask I believe, 'cos we're not ready to give up the "comforts" of modern life.Quote:
Originally Posted by nissannewby
https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...obiles.712881/
They discuss why turbines are more efficient at higher speeds so don't really suit autos but using the turbine to run an alternator is very doable.
Don't worry Dom, the last thing Gen Y will relinquish are the comforts of modern life. All will be good.Quote:
Originally Posted by dom14
Repost, different link than before Mr Plassy?
UPDATE;-)
(Apologies Ford didn't get contracted:-) )
http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/n.../1003-zh2.html
Water for troops out the 'Tail-Pipe' ;-)
I believe it took less than fifty years. Probably the commercial air crafts that look like modern jet turbine engine driven ones took few more years, but the speed it advanced was on par with personal computer technology.Quote:
Originally Posted by Plasnart
This is what we should be driving right now, if we started doing work on alternative fuel cars during the hippy era. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MB
Interesting read. http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/200...-turbine-cars/
What is the legal issue with catch cans? I wouldn't of thought they would be an emission issue?
..............
You're still venting but just catching the build of liquid that's all.Quote:
Originally Posted by AGman