Digital SLR Camera Advice..

That's it Cuppa, you are to be deported! ;)

Bit late on this one, but with regard to the low light capabilities of 'Mirrorless' in general, this relates to the sensor size still. Sony is probably King as they have some great Full Frame Mirrorless, but it is all Pro level gear that costs a bomb.

I use the Olympus Micro Four Thirds sized sensor (smaller than Cuppa's Sony 6500) and although it has limitations, it can still produce some decent results. Below are a couple of examples for reference.


http://www.nissanpatrol.com.au/forum...2018/04/99.jpgP6030221 by Ben Kincade, on Flickr

http://www.nissanpatrol.com.au/forum...018/04/100.jpgMoon rising over the camp by Ben Kincade, on Flickr

http://www.nissanpatrol.com.au/forum...018/04/101.jpgNight skies after the storm by Ben Kincade, on Flickr

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TPC

Cuppa, if you want your photos to look good you are going to have to choose a better subject for the photo like this.

Attachment 74936

---

Hmmm... so thats what an XU1 looked like from the side... not too bad I s'pose.

I only ever saw the front, for a few seconds, as it diminished in size in my rear view mirror.

I think there was a pic of the rear of one on the Morris Minor website for a while

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the evil twin

Hmmm... so thats what an XU1 looked like from the side... not too bad I s'pose.

I only ever saw the front, for a few seconds, as it diminished in size in my rear view mirror.

I think there was a pic of the rear of one on the Morris Minor website for a while

---

All the other contestants in the 1972 Bathurst got a good look at the back end of Peter Brocks XU1 as he lapped the rest of the field.

Attachment 74947