Please explain
Printable View
same here with the auto Ill get about 12 around town and 14 going away
No worries
12.5l/100kms always (highway and town, a/c on and a/c off), 12l/100kms if I didn't use cruise control.
Looks like my car is finally run in. Consistently getting 11.9L per 100ks and happy with that.
This is a mixture of highway/city/hills and I've got these figures over the last 3000ks plus. I've also been pushing the car a little harder than usual so surprised by these figures.
Trips have been a mixture of cruise and less OD than usual, includes quite a bit of Melb city, lots of Otway hills and country roads. No 4WD involved (unfortunately).
I have noticed this, the old GU2 would do 1000 to 1100 km on the 120l.
The new GU8 has only been getting around 900 to 950, might still be loosening up.
I haven't done a full tank run for a while without a trailer/boat/car on the back at some time.
Also noticed that the GU8 struggles at 70 in 4th towing the boat up the hill from Hillarys marina, the old GU2 easily accelerated up the same hill, although the GU8 appears to be geared a little higher.
Graham
Ok.. have you put yours on any scales yet??
Mine came in at 2.75T with only 60L of fuel in it..
The draws, braces, winch bar and diff mods all add up..
I haven't weighed it, only things added from base are towbar (genuine Nissan) Redarc Tow Pro Elite brake controller (must be at least 100 grams), a Tom Tom stuck to the windscreen & a set of rubber mats. Nothing to warrant a weight & balance check.
I am kind of liking not having a bull bar, although we have seen more roos in this one in 8 months than we did in the old one over 10 years.
Graham
Because the shape of the Patrol (which is not very aerodynamic friendly) the more speed the car is traveling it creates more drag force (pulling the car behind). I am not entirely sure whether this is the cause, but I never experienced any better fuel economy.
I used to have a Honda CRV which had an instantaneous fuel usage gauge, one thing I noticed from that was RPM is irrelevant to the fuel usage, you can go on 4th gear with less RPM but it used more fuel than going in 3rd with high rpm, of'course this is in the overlapping gear ratio speeds not always.
In the old td42 I can get 11L/100..
31" tyres and 90k/h..
Just to 13/100 if you do 100k /h..
And 14 /100 if I run 33's and 90k/h..
So it's all about the car..
One thing I have noticed with the crd manual is out 5th is very low in the rpm range at 100k..
I was told the other day by a comp truck driver that my fuel figures are too high and jpc are shit... apperently they only play with the fuel screw and that is all.
Gave me a number of a bloke who he swears by and says many of the blokes in the know use him.... now i am just regurgitating what he said but he did say look at all the guys back in 2005 that used jpc for their tuning and now how many are going to him (competition seen).
Also said brett was shit...lol
Had nothing bad to say about dieseltec.
4x4 obsession. ..
I would still like to try a different tuner for a second opinion.
I heard that jpc does not tune properly and does the lazy mans tune.?
Just bought a 92' Maverick and drove from QLD to Coffs. 500km and got 10.2l per hundred. Not sure what the norm is but The GU used more than that. The Mav is completely stock and only done 215,000 kms.