Thanks for the update Kalen.
I’ve had a look at the revised cover & feel that the
product has certainly been improved.
I am less certain about the changes to
pricing however. Is it possible that Club 4x4 realised what they were previously offering was not sustainable for the company & have used the changes to cover to address this?
If I am reading it correctly it seems that for the addition of ‘closing the gap’ between the previous
recovery to a gazetted road and the new
recovery to sealed road or nearest town comes at quite a hefty price increase. Both the 5% of claimed amount excess AND a hefty premium increase.
So in the case of $30,000 off road recovery cover there is a premium increase of $345 (from $255 to $600) plus if the full $30,000 is claimed an additional excess of $1500
I accept that the pricing has to keep your company profitable & afloat, & the addition of the 5% of the claimed amount does sound, as your press release says, equitable. However an added $345 to the previous premium of $255 to me seems an excessive amount just to cover the difference between ‘to a gazetted road’ & to a sealed road or nearest town’.
In the example given on your Simpson Desert recovery case study (
http://www.club4x4.com.au/case-studies/) the distance from the edge of the Simpson to Birdsville is around 40kms, a 45 minute drive for a recovery truck. $345 extra
premium to cover that does seem a lot.
Obviously there could be circumstances in other places where the additional distance covered to get to a sealed road or nearest town could be further, but shouldn’t this be what the 5% of claimed amount excess should cover? ;)
In principal I would accept a small premium increase AND the additional excess as reasonable for the added coverage, but a premium increase of a tad over 135%? Whew!