PDA

View Full Version : Patrol-range rover



luke28
1st February 2014, 03:51 PM
Does anybody know if range rover wheels fit on a patrol

threedogs
1st February 2014, 03:56 PM
No Range Rover use 5 stud pattern Patrol use 6 the same as landcruisers , pajera and Jackaroo
All are not interchangeable though

luke28
1st February 2014, 04:17 PM
Cheers I knew that pajero and hilux would wasn't sure about range rover

luke28
1st February 2014, 04:18 PM
What do you think about a 89 range rover any good

james008
1st February 2014, 04:26 PM
In what sense?
In terms of comfort they are very good, and they are excellent off road even in stock form.
I'm unsure, but I think the 89 model may have a viscous centre diff, which is not as effective as the older style mechanical locking diff.
And also, the V8 note is nothing short of glorious.
The 89 should also be an EFI model, this was a big improvement on the old carby setup.

Personally, I love old Range Rovers. If I was not on my P plates, I would have one in a heartbeat.

Downsides are they are thirsty, not as strong as a Patrol in the driveline, they tend to develoo oil leaks and they can be unreliable, however regular proper maintenance can go a long way to resolving many issues.

mudnut
1st February 2014, 04:28 PM
Depends what you want it for. I have heard that their electrics play up a bit, but have not been told of any one instance. I think they use the same V8 as the discovery, but don't quote me on that. My sister owns a V8 disco and has had an excellent run with it.

threedogs
1st February 2014, 04:31 PM
Mate I love rangies 89 is still a mk 2 I think , look for the lse model its longer than others
First motor was an alloy 4.4 same as P76 then they went to a 3.9 been a while for me

james008
1st February 2014, 04:36 PM
Mate I love rangies 89 is still a mk 2 I think , look for the lse model its longer than others
First moyor was an alloy 4.4 same as P76 then they went to a 3.9 been a while for me

First motor was a 3.5 V8.
I think it is just a smaller version of the 4.4, as was the 3.9
The 4.4 is a common swap though.

threedogs
1st February 2014, 04:42 PM
yeah I;m all excited first motor was 3.5
4.4 was a common replacement
3.9 not the best motor around,
there are a few early diesels kicking around.
stay away from the air suspension at $6K a corner its $$$ to repair.
As mentioned the electrics let them down, but they are smooth to drive,
took one to Cape York in 1983

luke28
1st February 2014, 05:34 PM
Someone offered me a 89 rangie 4" lift cb brush bars 3 months reg for my 86 mq swb duel fuel dual battery 4 months reg

james008
1st February 2014, 05:34 PM
Yep, wouldn't touch air suspension on them.
The 3.5 seemed a more reliable motor than the 3.9, and was a common conversion into Triumph Stags to replace the unreliable 3.0 V8 they had... Useless little fact there.
And the diesels were slllloooowwwww. Interestingly I had a look at rangies for sale for a few months and I found only 1 diesel that hadn't blown up.

4 speed gearboxes are known to be stronger than the 5 speeds, but I believe on 5 speed models the stronger and better geared LT230 transfer from a Disco 1 is an almost bolt in replacement. Another relatively useless fact there...

luke28
1st February 2014, 05:35 PM
And the rear diff on the range rover is noisy second hand diff around 150 apparently

james008
1st February 2014, 05:38 PM
Someone offered me a 89 rangie 4" lift cb brush bars 3 months reg for my 86 mq swb duel fuel dual battery 4 months reg

That seems like a decent swap.
The MK will be stronger in the driveline and more reliable, but the Rangie will be a lot nicer car to drive.
Will it be a daily or a weekend only car?

luke28
1st February 2014, 05:42 PM
Both I just need something bigger for the 3 kids really want another gq but ill take the range rover for now I think if the bloke is still keen

james008
1st February 2014, 07:47 PM
The Rangie will definitely take kids better than a shorty Patrol lol.
How old are your kids? Because of the Rangies fairly short wheelbase the rear seats are right over the rear wheel arch, which isn't good for older kids. But on the plus side you'll be comfy.

luke28
1st February 2014, 08:01 PM
6 4 & 2 Id even be happy to get a 3 seat for the back of the shorty I've only got a 2 seater

GQ TANK
23rd February 2014, 01:55 PM
I had a 2 door rangie with the 3.5L v8, fitted with a holly.

Off road it was great, on the road it was slow and drank the juice. - worse then my TB42 GQ. ( especially until I changed the cam - as it had worn a lobe down)

I liked the ride, but the ball and chain used to get sea sick (didn't help when I had a contain of water in the back that used to slosh around. Mine was dual fuel with a internal tank. It was a pain using the fold down seats - but I didn't have ankle biters at the time.

As I had later model seat in her with arm rests - it fun to drive.

90mav
16th May 2014, 07:08 AM
I had a petrol gq years ago and briefly considered swapping for a rangie... until I actually drove one from a dealer on the Gold Coast. It sounded nice but was the most gutless thing I had ever driven! It would make my rd28 gu look zippy by comparison. I jumped back in the Q and never looked back. If someone offers to swap one for your patrol there is probably a good reason!