OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: Pertronix - Hall Effect Vs Lobe Sensor what is the difference?

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    5,666
    Thanks
    2,731
    Thanked 1,443 Times in 1,007 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by taslucas View Post
    A mate just fitted the pertronix ignitor 2 hall effect along with the flamethrower2 coil (45,000 volts, 0.6 ohms resistance). He reckons it drives way better. I'm just about to order one for me. Check out rusty nails diy thread, he shows how he fitted a pertronix ignitor 1. Lobe sensing (while keeping the factory coil).
    The points are removed for the lobe sensing version. I think it uses a magnet to sense everytime the lobes go past (instead of the lobes mechanicaly moving the points open). The hall effect one uses a magnetic ring that slides over the lobes and gives a better signal to the module. The only reason you need to machine the shaft is so the magnetic ring fits over the little step that the rotor button sits on...

    Tap, crackle, pop
    Just to add a bit to the above quoted post, its dead easy to remove & refit the top shaft that needs the step knocked off from the distributor without removing the entire dizzy. no more skill is required than whats needed to fit the Pertornix in the first place.

    I took mine into the local machine shop & they machined it off for under $20 clams.... Problem solved.

  2. #22
    Patrol God taslucas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    North West Tas
    Posts
    10,804
    Thanks
    3,366
    Thanked 6,886 Times in 3,670 Posts
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Yeah we had the dissy out anyway. They put it in a vice, a drill on one end to turn the shaft, and a file to machine it down:-)

    Tap, crackle, pop
    Hello from Under Down Under!

  3. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    5,666
    Thanks
    2,731
    Thanked 1,443 Times in 1,007 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by taslucas View Post
    Yeah we had the dissy out anyway. They put it in a vice, a drill on one end to turn the shaft, and a file to machine it down:-)

    Tap, crackle, pop
    Did you remove the shaft or just did the machining of the shaft in the distributor????
    Last edited by patch697; 20th September 2012 at 04:14 PM.

  4. #24
    Expert Irvs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Parkdale, VIC
    Posts
    243
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 36 Times in 29 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Patch he means he gripped the shaft of the dissy in the chunk of his drill while the whole thing was out and then just pulled the trigger and filed it down, kinda like a low rpm makeshift lathe.

    In Rusty Nails thread I added the extra steps you need to take to fit the Pertronix 2 with some photos, but if you follow pretty much exactly what I wrote earlier in this thread you shouldn't have any dramas. If your in Melbourne I can do it with you if you'd like.
    1990 Ford Maverick, 4.2 Carby, 2" SL, 2" BL, Dual Batts, 33" Maxxis Big Horns

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Irvs For This Useful Post:

    patch697 (20th September 2012), taslucas (20th September 2012)

  6. #25
    ckh
    Guest
    Whats confusing the hell out of me, is in the ebay description at one point it says lobe sensing, then further down the page it make reference to the magnets creating the hall effect....

  7. #26
    ckh
    Guest
    Arrived yesterday nothing like the picture in the bay auction, as mentioned above, was supprised that no magnetic ring was packaged, after reading the instruction, said this model didnt need it, so wired it up, and it started.. was not impressed with the flame thrower coil as it didnt come with its own mounting bracket, and being almost half the size of the coil that was in it, which looked like more than likley the origional coil, had to modify existing coil holer to hold the new coil in place, cant say I'm impressed with it yet, was near dark by the time i installed it. so havent done the timing on it yet, will see if that makes a difference, have read on here to set it to 12 degrees BTDC, will update after that...
    but so far ... FAR from what their sales pitch says
    Delivers twice the voltage to the spark plugs, increasing horsepower, fuel economy, and spark plug life.
    2:1 improvement over points in current fall time for increased coil output.
    Rotating cobalt magnets trigger a Hall Effect integrated circuit . ...no points to burn, ...no moving parts to wear out.
    System is designed for use with most point-type coils, optimal performance achieved when used with our Flame-ThrowerŪ 40,000 volt coil.
    Works great in stock point-type distributors as a trigger for multi-spark CD ignitions, eliminating the need for expensive aftermarket distributors.
    No complicated wiring makes installation easy.
    A solid-state electronic ignition system. "Never change points again!"
    Epoxy molding makes our module impervious to dirt, oil, grease and moisture.
    Fits entirely inside the distributor.
    No "black box to clutter the engine compartment.
    Stable timing ...no need for any adjustments.
    Will trigger most multi-spark CD ignitions.
    Use with Flame-ThrowerŪ 40,000 volt coil for optimal performance.

  8. #27
    ckh
    Guest
    Although I left positive feedback on ebay, but commented on it looking nothing like the picture, the guy is refusing to give me any feedback, and has pretty much told me, if something goes wrong with it, tuff luck.... real nice guy....

  9. #28
    Expert Irvs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Parkdale, VIC
    Posts
    243
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 36 Times in 29 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah mate as said the eBay picture is a generic one and you got did end up getting the right one anyway, I just wedged some cardboard in between my coil holder and coil, still haven't gotten around to fixing it yet, might do it soon, haha
    1990 Ford Maverick, 4.2 Carby, 2" SL, 2" BL, Dual Batts, 33" Maxxis Big Horns

  10. #29
    Hardcore
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    central coast nsw
    Posts
    2,011
    Thanks
    625
    Thanked 513 Times in 388 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Std coil is larger proberly holds more oil for better cooling.
    may not be impressed now.
    you will be impressed not having to play with points every other month.
    IF IT'S NOT A NISSAN.
    THEN IT'S A COMPROMISE

  11. #30
    Advanced
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    31
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi folks,

    I'm also looking for a Petronix for my 4.2 Carby, but now I am kind of confused...
    I checked the Petronix catalog and found a Patrol on top of page 15.

    For distributor make Hitachi - Ignitor 1763LS - Ignitor II 91763LS


    On page 21 I found the 1762

    For distributor make Mitsubishi TOT 00471 - Ignitor 1762LS
    ..........TOT 00471, 22100 03510 (Nissan) - Ignitor 1762 - Ignitor II 91762


    Now which one is the right one???
    As my Patrol is still in Namibia and I am buried in Germany there is no big chance to have a closer look at the Dissy...

    Cheers

    Smile
    Last edited by Smile; 4th February 2013 at 07:10 PM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •