-
27th October 2013, 07:41 PM
#31
Rotaredom
Originally Posted by
Westy's Accessories
I personally would not use the above products, anything not water proof your wasting your time and money.
Originally Posted by
Parksy
Now that looks very interesting and promising as a waterproof deadener, will have 2 look into that product some more
Time is never wasted when your wasted all the time
WARNING: Towballs used for recoveries can, and do kill people and damage property.
-
-
27th October 2013 07:41 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
27th October 2013, 08:13 PM
#32
Patrol God
Originally Posted by
NissanGQ4.2
I personally would not use the above products, anything not water proof your wasting your time and money.
Now that looks very interesting and promising as a waterproof deadener, will have 2 look into that product some more
No need to be mean about it...
Lol
I guess it depends on where you use the products.
I'm waiting for a reply from the 2 joints to see if I can grab a sample.
Personally think both options will be fine in water, option one is a closed cell foam, what is seen from the outter it looks porous but water can't penetrate further..
Option 2 I'm still waiting on a reply.
-
-
27th October 2013, 09:08 PM
#33
Rotaredom
Not been mean mate, just how I see it.....................if it doesn't withstand water and you can't pull it up easily with the carpet when it gets wet, 2 me its a waste of time and money.
Even if I didn't plan on doing a river crossing or bog holes I would still use something that is waterproof.
Time is never wasted when your wasted all the time
WARNING: Towballs used for recoveries can, and do kill people and damage property.
-
-
28th October 2013, 07:01 AM
#34
Patrol God
Originally Posted by
NissanGQ4.2
Not been mean mate, just how I see it.....................if it doesn't withstand water and you can't pull it up easily with the carpet when it gets wet, 2 me its a waste of time and money.
Even if I didn't plan on doing a river crossing or bog holes I would still use something that is waterproof.
Yea for sure. I was wondering how it would go stuck to the back of the carpet??
-
-
28th October 2013, 08:46 PM
#35
Patrol Freak
Got the dynamat today and its allot heavier than the fatmat. Doesn't smell like asphalt either so I know it's a butyl product. It's very sticky compared to the fatmat and sticks very well, but doesn't form as easy as the fatmat. I find I can't use the handle end of a screw driver to form the stuff like I could with the fatmat, but my fingers did the job just fine. I did the rear floor section under the rear seats while they are out. Am waiting for the jaycar stuff and will line the floor with this stuff also.
-
-
28th October 2013, 09:25 PM
#36
Patrol God
Nice. Well sorta. You've just bashed my wallet a little more..
-
-
28th October 2013, 09:33 PM
#37
Patrol Freak
Yeah it's not exactly cheap, but tomorrow's drive to work will give me an indication of any improvement with this stuff. Here's hoping for deafening silence!
-
-
28th October 2013, 09:43 PM
#38
Patrol God
Do you think 100% coverage with the base was worth it? Or do you think this other blokes 25% coverage would obtain the same outcome?
But after your previous comments, dynamat is the better pick??
-
-
28th October 2013, 09:55 PM
#39
Patrol Freak
Yeah dynamat for the win! Absolutely. No I don't think absolute coverage is necessary. Maybe if you want the thermo blocking properties, but for vibration reduction it only needs minimal coverage to do the job.
-
-
28th October 2013, 10:01 PM
#40
Patrol God
Sorry, this their 4x4 water proof closed cell foam..
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item...d=151094843053
I still think the jaycar stuff is a little cheaper but..
-