OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64

Thread: Snorkle intake backwards, better fuel economy....GU8

  1. #31
    The master farter
    mudski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Eltham North
    Posts
    15,618
    Thanks
    8,680
    Thanked 11,319 Times in 6,443 Posts
    Mentioned
    462 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Placebo affect maybe.
    I really can't see how turning the snorkel backwards gives you better eco. Theoretically, it would be worse. But having said that. If you have the numbers, who am I to argue...

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

     

  3. #32
    Expert
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Pottsville
    Posts
    185
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you also say in your first thread that you had the cruise control on. I thought this would make it worse. I am still not a believer of your test.
    3lt GU 111 Wagon 2 inch lift,3in Taipan exhaust, cross country intercooler,catch can,EGR blocked, dawes and needle valve,Pyro/boost gauge ARB lockers,steinbaurer chip, long range tank, s/s water tank, draws, warn winch, and other stuff.

  4. #33
    Expert
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    340
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 63 Times in 27 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cruise control for all highway runs, forward facing intake and backwards, this way it was comparative.

    Doing the test again this Friday run number 6, wait and see i guess
    SHINY AND NEW: 2015 Series 2 Y62 Ti in White. Bone stock, hate to say it but its the wifes car this time.

    OLD SOLD:Silver 50th Anniversary Patrol, 2" Pro-Comp Lift, 32" MT ATZ 4 Rib, 9000lb Warn Winch, UH7700NB + BT UHF Brilliant. Ultra Gauge and some GO FAST bits........

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to WogsRus For This Useful Post:

    Stropp (16th June 2013)

  6. #34
    Beginner
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    awsome thread!
    - has anyone get figure comparing stock vs shornkel economy (before/after instal)?
    - is the length/diameter of the shnorkel having any influence vs the needed flow?
    - would the shnorkel be recommended only for (slow) offroad drives?
    - can you guys easily disconnect the shnorkel (without unmounting) and revert to stock (say when on highways)?

    (- last but not least: what happens with shnorkel facing sideway (in addition to the blow sound)?)

  7. #35
    The 747 Winnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Gippsland, VIC
    Posts
    15,822
    Thanks
    7,275
    Thanked 12,430 Times in 6,262 Posts
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Why would you ever want to disconnect the snorkel? If anything the air you are getting is ever so slightly cooler which would effectively better your fuel consumption.

    If you're happy and you know it tap a post!

  8. #36
    Expert twisty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked 88 Times in 49 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pascal1 View Post
    - has anyone get figure comparing stock vs shornkel economy (before/after instal)?
    Yep. No change for me. But I do have a cleaner air filter.
    GU1 Auto ST4500 lpg/petrol.

  9. #37
    Enjoying the trips macca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Old Bar, NSW
    Posts
    3,051
    Thanks
    1,640
    Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,080 Posts
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interesting experiment Wogs, I can not turn mine so have no idea if it makes a change with my 4.2.
    Thinking facing forward would have some positive pressure at the filter box and rear would be a little negative pressure. If car was doing 100kph with engine off I feel confident that is what you would see.
    Does that mean your cars air to fuel mix is a little lean when the top is forward, that is slightly more air in the mix.
    When turned the other way it runs a bit richer, higher concentration of fuel getting to the engine and it likes it.
    The difference would be minimal, could it make a difference?
    Like said before its one for Jamie & Adam on Mythbusters.
    Cheers
    Macca

  10. #38
    Beginner
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sideway would create vac like a chimney effect, maybe there is more positive pressure from behind, maybe you have hit a sweet spot in your air fuel ratio?

  11. #39
    Beginner
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Maybe air pressure coming off the windscreen surrounds? The A9X Torana scope faces backwards at the high pressure area at the base of the screen.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to riotpatrol For This Useful Post:

    trekster (27th June 2015)

  13. #40
    Patrol Guru Drew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Western burbs of Melbourne
    Posts
    991
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 211 Times in 133 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Could the ram air effect be messing with the MAF (giving it a slightly different figure) than what would be without the snorkle ?
    ------------
    2008 GU 3.0 CRD Auto - Life's too short to eat bad food.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •