OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 64

Thread: Snorkle intake backwards, better fuel economy....GU8

  1. #51
    Expert
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    340
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 63 Times in 27 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well ok just to convince myself, turned the snorkle facing forwards, cold morning like 2 deg C including Black ice, fuel economy according to Ultra Gauge was 12.8, n the way back, turned it back and got to 11.2.

    I have not idea WTF is going on ut it works for meeeeeeeeeeeeee
    SHINY AND NEW: 2015 Series 2 Y62 Ti in White. Bone stock, hate to say it but its the wifes car this time.

    OLD SOLD:Silver 50th Anniversary Patrol, 2" Pro-Comp Lift, 32" MT ATZ 4 Rib, 9000lb Warn Winch, UH7700NB + BT UHF Brilliant. Ultra Gauge and some GO FAST bits........

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to WogsRus For This Useful Post:

    blocko05 (19th September 2015), mudnut (22nd June 2013), Stropp (22nd June 2013)

  3. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

     

  4. #52
    Hardcore
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    central coast nsw
    Posts
    2,011
    Thanks
    625
    Thanked 513 Times in 388 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    lots of ways to look at this one,
    forward facing = lean mixture and the foot goes down to achieve speed, as noted 120kph
    backwards = factory settings for mixture,
    (assuming factory tune is minus the snorkel).
    less right foot for same speed 120kph and improve economy.
    engine conditions and tune!!
    driving habits from each individual.
    then a tail wind can also make a big difference.
    lots to get ya thinking, this forum is soooo usefull.
    IF IT'S NOT A NISSAN.
    THEN IT'S A COMPROMISE

  5. #53
    Patrol Freak Rustyboner81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,042
    Thanks
    456
    Thanked 420 Times in 242 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wouldnt this be due to the MAF sensors (mass air flow sensor)? It calculates the air flow and corrects the fuel mixtures.. turning the snorkel backwsrds creates negative pressure which reduces the air going into the engine and then adjusts the fuel accordingly.

    Be interesting to see how the carbys go. Probably starve of fuel
    '92 (MIGHTY) GQ ST 3.0L Duel Petrol / LPG, 2" Pedders Suspension Lift on 33x12.5x15 BigHorns
    Lukey 2.5" Performance Exhaust with Extractors, snorkel
    Auto Lokka In The Front, Duel Batteries, Stiff Deep Dish Steering Wheel,


  6. #54
    Patrol God threedogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Melb
    Posts
    31,636
    Thanks
    10,350
    Thanked 9,963 Times in 7,394 Posts
    Mentioned
    113 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Melbourne to the Murray river say 250 Ks What ppl don't know its up hill all the way.
    Big fuel difference if you fill at the Murray and drive south, usually with a howling tail wind
    and down hill, Just had snorkel fitted and has made no difference so far to economy.
    Maybe summer I'll be sourcing cooler air, cant see how it makes a difference as it stops at
    the filter. I'm getting about 330k to half tank and 560k when light comes on.
    04 ST 3lt auto, not enough Mods to keep me happy, but getting there

  7. #55
    Expert
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    River Heads Q
    Posts
    466
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked 365 Times in 146 Posts
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just to see for myself, I turned my genuine Nissan snorkel head sideways as it won't do a full 180 without hitting windscreen.
    I was sceptical but last full tank returned 12.8lt per 100k instead of usual 13.25 to 13.75. No change to driving conditions.
    Going over to the Island early September so sand driving will distort figures but will check again when I return to normal driving.
    It doesn't make sense but appears right.
    At the end of the day, all you have is yourself and all you need is your friends (and in our case our Patrol)
    2006 GUI1 4.2TDi Coil Cab "almost" standard

  8. #56
    Patrol God Sir Roofy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    TRAFALGAR VIC
    Posts
    8,069
    Thanks
    3,005
    Thanked 4,447 Times in 2,546 Posts
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by threedogs View Post
    melbourne to the murray river say 250 ks what ppl don't know its up hill all the way.
    Big fuel difference if you fill at the murray and drive south, usually with a howling tail wind
    and down hill, just had snorkel fitted and has made no difference so far to economy.
    Maybe summer i'll be sourcing cooler air, cant see how it makes a difference as it stops at
    the filter. I'm getting about 330k to half tank and 560k when light comes on.
    thats about the same as mine it would vary as driving style is different

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Sir Roofy For This Useful Post:

    threedogs (6th April 2016)

  10. #57
    Patrol God threedogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Melb
    Posts
    31,636
    Thanks
    10,350
    Thanked 9,963 Times in 7,394 Posts
    Mentioned
    113 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Well my snorkel has improved my economy I now get 360 to
    half tank and 12.6 /100 k around town on 305 muddies,
    snorkel will remain facing forward
    04 ST 3lt auto, not enough Mods to keep me happy, but getting there

  11. #58
    Expert janderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Bearii Vic
    Posts
    369
    Thanks
    238
    Thanked 207 Times in 132 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A turbo vehicle will only use the air that is needed, any more and it is expelled out the wast gate. So I would think forced in air is a small factor. As a turbo will suck the air that it needs, so then facing the snorkel to the back should not matter other than supplying cleaner air. Threedogs is also right, coming up to the Murray is all up hill.
    1st G60 Then MQ Now GU

  12. #59
    Expert
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    sunshinecoast
    Posts
    309
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 103 Times in 82 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    hi guys , interesting thread .
    wogsrus I just had an idea , if you set your ultra gauge to read the MAF sensor then get the patrol upto 100kpa on the highway and see what the maf reading is . do this with the snorkel facing forward , then try it backwards . this would let us know weather or not changing the snorkel direction changes the maf sensor reading , which I assume would change the fuel mixture . over the years I've heard people mention that they get better mileage with a snorkel , but can't remember anyone saying they had better mileage with the head turned backwards until common rail motors came along . ray

  13. #60
    Advanced
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    very interesting read.
    did anhyone tryt it with a carb yet?

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •