OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Grenade V's CRD? main differences?

  1. #1
    Patrol Freak Bigcol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Swan Valley Perth
    Posts
    1,479
    Thanks
    1,028
    Thanked 541 Times in 387 Posts
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Grenade V's CRD? main differences?

    okies oh all knowing and all seeing (?)

    ticking over in the back of my mind is an idea of updating my much loved GQ
    now
    with the GU's
    4.2turbo's are out - they are manual (have to think of the missus driving to and from work)
    so that leaves the grenade & the new CRD
    so, apart from the obvious (common rail = no mechanical pump as such) how much difference is there between these motors?
    torque----
    Kw------
    failings - - - - - do you need to do the same prevention to the CRD as you do with the 3.0L????

    if they are the same, then I am thinking that I cannot justify the extra folding on a new car V's an older one........ which I would hope would have more fruit on it

    whats everyone's thoughts??????


    cheers

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

     

  3. #2
    Legendary
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,422
    Thanks
    516
    Thanked 2,137 Times in 1,001 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both are ZD30 engines, Nissan just adapted a common rail fuel system to the later engines to get it past emmission regulations until the new engine is released. I don't have exact figures, but the CRD motors only had slightly more power and torque than the DI motors.

    The series 3 onwards DI motors were more reliable than the earlier engines, the CRD's are better again and as such don't require the same level of reliabillity mods. That said, I recommend fitting boost and pyro gauges to ALL turbo diesels.

    Tony

  4. #3
    Expert Chaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    228
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 98 Times in 64 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Di and CRD share similar power and torque ratings. 118KW at 3600rpm and 380nm at 2000rpm (Manual) and 354nm at 2000rpm (Auto), so basically no difference in performance on paper. Personally, I’ve found the CRD to have slightly more torque below 2000rpm, but less pull above 3000rpm than the Di.

    The CRD is a much quieter engine and has a much smarter ECU with better control over fuel and boost. The CRD has addressed some of the ZD30 issues with improved boost control, shorter glow periods and better fuel mixture control, but it still needs a crankcase filter. It also has an improved cylinder head design compared to the Di. On the downside, there have been many reports of high fuel consumption and EGT’s compared to the Di, but so far no reports of the typical ZD30 failures that we use to hear of, but it still may be too early to tell.
    Last edited by Chaz; 8th October 2010 at 06:52 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •