-
25th May 2012, 04:25 PM
#1
thoughts on a mk 2.8 petrol
hey ppl, im thinking of buying a mk with a 2.8 carby petrol in it i just want to no what everyone thoughts are towards the 2.8 motors
thanks
-
-
25th May 2012 04:25 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
25th May 2012, 04:46 PM
#2
also i forgot to ask if the 2.8l is a 4 or 6 cylinder
-
-
25th May 2012, 05:46 PM
#3
6 cylinder
They are a great robust engine, the same engine as the nissan Z cars
Love to rev, but when in a 4by they love the juice
Dont have the low down torque of the diesels, but out rev the diesels
Sound lovely spinning at 6,000 rpm.....
-
-
25th May 2012, 08:56 PM
#4
As MQ says, they love the juice however I love it as it's so simple to fix IF it breaks down. Apart from that, heaps of room in the engine bay to add other goodies
Whoever disagrees with the saying "Might is right" obviously doesn't own a MQ
-
-
25th May 2012, 09:00 PM
#5
ok cool thanks guys the one i have found i really like i own a gq wagon atm but going to sell it.
is there many mods we could do to the 2.8 in the mk
-
-
25th May 2012, 09:09 PM
#6
I'm in the process of learning as I go and will be doing a rebuild on mine (check Bryans MQ/MK Build) when I remove the body, will flick the motor off to a local bloke that does "classics" to give her a new lease of life. I'd prob leave mine as she is as believe in the KISS principle LOL
Whoever disagrees with the saying "Might is right" obviously doesn't own a MQ
-
-
25th May 2012, 09:14 PM
#7
ok cool thanks mate ill have a look
-
-
25th May 2012, 09:32 PM
#8
just wondering how many k's i would get out of a tank fuel with the 2.8l, im getting around 400k's out of a 80L tank in my gq wagon.
-
-
26th May 2012, 10:14 AM
#9
They are,depending on the engines condition and how you drive em , rather heavy on the juice and get ruffy 5K/l (20 l per 100)
Ive a log book here of an mq 2.8 petrol wagon and over many years and many tanks it was around that
What to do to them ,
Basics,electric ignition,extractors, better carb (tho the factory 2 barrell carb is adequete)
Slip over to the nissan Z car forum, those blokes love em
Can go twin carb, injection(factory on L series powered Z cars) maybe triple webers if youve a lazy few grand lying around , whatever your wallet allows, but some of this power adding stuff isnt good for off road applications
-
-
1st June 2012, 08:43 AM
#10
Advanced
Own/Owned several petrol GQ/MQ's. The MQ is much lighter and use around 30%+ less fuel than the GQ (petrol). MQ parts like L28, clutch, service items, water pump etc. are around 1/3 the price of GQ parts as long as you don't mention the Patrol word
Adding fuel injection from a later model 280Z or Skyline L28, will decrease the fuel consumption a lot more. The engine responds well to extractors, cams and a good flow job on the heads. L28s rev like crazy! I love them, but, for less money you can convert the L28 to a RB30E (EFI).... more power, better fuel consumption, more torque... standard. Lots of gearbox options as well with the divorced transfer case of the L28 LWB.
I owned a LWB L28 ute that averaged 8.5km/L on the freeway with Weber DCS40 carby, extractors and easily did a sub 10 second 0-100km/h on 33 muddies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syhPI04b4nM
GQ '94 Petrol LPG 2" lift, drawers, roof rack with tent - tourer
MQ '82 L28 Auto Petrol LPG - current restoration project
-