OUR VIDEOS GALLERY MEMBER SPONSORSHIP VENDOR SPONSORSHIP

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: thoughts on a mk 2.8 petrol

  1. #1
    Advanced
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    thoughts on a mk 2.8 petrol

    hey ppl, im thinking of buying a mk with a 2.8 carby petrol in it i just want to no what everyone thoughts are towards the 2.8 motors
    thanks

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many

     

  3. #2
    Advanced
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    also i forgot to ask if the 2.8l is a 4 or 6 cylinder

  4. #3
    Patrol Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Benarkin QLD
    Posts
    932
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 247 Times in 196 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    6 cylinder
    They are a great robust engine, the same engine as the nissan Z cars
    Love to rev, but when in a 4by they love the juice
    Dont have the low down torque of the diesels, but out rev the diesels
    Sound lovely spinning at 6,000 rpm.....

  5. #4
    Expert
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Napier, NZ
    Posts
    276
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As MQ says, they love the juice however I love it as it's so simple to fix IF it breaks down. Apart from that, heaps of room in the engine bay to add other goodies
    Whoever disagrees with the saying "Might is right" obviously doesn't own a MQ

  6. #5
    Advanced
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ok cool thanks guys the one i have found i really like i own a gq wagon atm but going to sell it.
    is there many mods we could do to the 2.8 in the mk

  7. #6
    Expert
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Napier, NZ
    Posts
    276
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm in the process of learning as I go and will be doing a rebuild on mine (check Bryans MQ/MK Build) when I remove the body, will flick the motor off to a local bloke that does "classics" to give her a new lease of life. I'd prob leave mine as she is as believe in the KISS principle LOL
    Whoever disagrees with the saying "Might is right" obviously doesn't own a MQ

  8. #7
    Advanced
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ok cool thanks mate ill have a look

  9. #8
    Advanced
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    just wondering how many k's i would get out of a tank fuel with the 2.8l, im getting around 400k's out of a 80L tank in my gq wagon.

  10. #9
    Patrol Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Benarkin QLD
    Posts
    932
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 247 Times in 196 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They are,depending on the engines condition and how you drive em , rather heavy on the juice and get ruffy 5K/l (20 l per 100)
    Ive a log book here of an mq 2.8 petrol wagon and over many years and many tanks it was around that
    What to do to them ,
    Basics,electric ignition,extractors, better carb (tho the factory 2 barrell carb is adequete)
    Slip over to the nissan Z car forum, those blokes love em
    Can go twin carb, injection(factory on L series powered Z cars) maybe triple webers if youve a lazy few grand lying around , whatever your wallet allows, but some of this power adding stuff isnt good for off road applications

  11. #10
    Advanced Johan Safari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Cockatoo VIC
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Own/Owned several petrol GQ/MQ's. The MQ is much lighter and use around 30%+ less fuel than the GQ (petrol). MQ parts like L28, clutch, service items, water pump etc. are around 1/3 the price of GQ parts as long as you don't mention the Patrol word
    Adding fuel injection from a later model 280Z or Skyline L28, will decrease the fuel consumption a lot more. The engine responds well to extractors, cams and a good flow job on the heads. L28s rev like crazy! I love them, but, for less money you can convert the L28 to a RB30E (EFI).... more power, better fuel consumption, more torque... standard. Lots of gearbox options as well with the divorced transfer case of the L28 LWB.
    I owned a LWB L28 ute that averaged 8.5km/L on the freeway with Weber DCS40 carby, extractors and easily did a sub 10 second 0-100km/h on 33 muddies.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syhPI04b4nM
    GQ '94 Petrol LPG 2" lift, drawers, roof rack with tent - tourer
    MQ '82 L28 Auto Petrol LPG - current restoration project

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •